![]() This approach is also the easiest to maintain as you’re always working with one codebase. While using RWD does not give you a direct SEO boost, Google recommends it because it allows for easier crawling. ![]() ![]() Responsive Web Design answers the growing need for accessibility on the web, especially on mobile devices.Īnd it’s a great approach to adapt from the SEO perspective. A website can resize, shrink, enlarge, or move the content to remain readable and accessible to all users, regardless of the device they are using. Responsive Web Design is an approach to web design in which websites adapt to screen and window sizes on various devices. It will be interesting to see how it performs on different machines, if at all.You can no longer keep all of your visitors satisfied with a website mainly designed for desktop. Will definitely try on 10,1 imac and eventually on 2010 13in mbp and both my 2012 mbps (13 and 15in). Will consider trying it for the 8,1 imac. I could not get it to properly install on imac 9,1. Or just bootcamp your old unsupported mac to windows 10 as the main OS and macOS as secondary to bring out some of its latent potential to 2021. I will test it on other unsupported macs just for the fun of it, but if you are just going to use it for basic youtube, social media, email, web browsing and word documents, then upgrading to Big Sur will not feel that much different, especially with an SSD and maxed out ram from Catalina, Mojave or High Sierra IMO.īut I would rather buy a second generation silicon mac to truly take advantage of the new OS features and remain on Catalina (or HS) for everything else. It is currently running 11.1 for I guess about a month now. ![]() The same has not happened on Big Sur so far. For that, I just revert back to High Sierra.Ĭatalina on the other hand with amd graphics on, screen went wild and crazy. I wouldn’t edit video on this thing or open heavy photoshop files. When I turned it back on, everything was working within normal expectations. I tried turning off dedicated AMD graphics and as expected, I lost support for a secondary display. Even without graphics acceleration, it hasn’t given me any real issues. I installed it on my 2011 17in mbp with AMD graphics and it runs fine. Although some newer officially unsupported Macs reportedly run Big Sur fine, many older Macs are not supported for a reason, and so the expectation shouldn’t be for a great or perfect experience if you go this route. Is this worth the hassle, risk, or effort to force Big Sur onto an unsupported Mac? That’s for you to decide, depending on your technical competency and how badly you want to run macOS Big Sur on a Mac that it wasn’t intended for.įor the vast majority of Mac users, if you’re already running a functional version of Mac OS system software on another computer, it’s recommended to simply stay on whatever version that is rather than try to force the Mac to run unsupported system software. The experience now is closer to that of running a Hackintosh PC compared to simply patching an installer and letting it run on an older Mac. If you have past experience using the excellent DosDude tool for Mojave or for installing Catalina on unsupported Macs, you’ll find the Big Sur Micropatcher is not quite as simple, and Dosdude has already publicly stated that a Big Sur patcher will not become available. You’ll want to be sure to read through the entire document and follow the steps very carefully if you attempt to go this route, as it’s fairly complicated.Īs with all unofficial tweaks and mods like this, there is no official support, but there’s a useful thread on MacRumors Forums that pertains to the topic that may be of use to the adventurous users out there who wish to try this. Head over to Big Sur Micropatcher on Github to review the process and download the patcher.You’ll want to make sure you have a complete backup of the Mac with Time Machine before even attempting any of this. One of the major caveats mentioned is to avoid any Mac that doesn’t have a Metal GPU, as the performance is apparently very slow on those older Macs. It’s fairly well documented on the patches Github page, but it’s not for the average user by any means, and you’re on your own if you attempt to use it to run Big Sur on a Mac that otherwise wouldn’t support it. The approach we’ll mention here is perhaps the best documented, using a “primitive USB patcher” that is applied to a USB boot disk. If you’re an advanced user who is comfortable with running unsupported system software on unsupported hardware, and you’re feeling adventurous, there are some solutions to install and run macOS Big Sur on unsupported Macs, but it’s nowhere near as straight forward or simple as installing Big Sur on an officially supported Mac is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |